![]() ![]() Take Metaesquema 362 (1958)-stacks of variously sized black rectangles tilt at different angles, as if excitedly jiggling in place, cheekily resisting the dogma of the grid. ![]() The exhibition starts at the beginning, with Oiticica’s friendly formalist paintings on paper and cardboard from the 1950s. Image courtesy Carnegie Museum of Art.īut a potential critique of the institutional framework begins to seem petty upon confronting the art: it is stunning. And I’m consistently bothered by the curatorial snake oil of staging these types of vexing dilemmas front and center, as if by directly pointing to the issue the organizers can recuse themselves of the responsibility of solving it. ![]() It is infrequently shown in the US this is Oiticica’s most comprehensive museum survey to date. Oiticica was an artist I loved but of whom I had no first-hand experience, and I imagine that many other visitors will also be encountering his work in the flesh for the first time. I was conflicted about the answer to that question before I saw the exhibition, which debuted at Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Museum of Art, stopped over at the Art Institute of Chicago, and is now finishing up at the Whitney. So what’s the better alternative: to refuse to present or recreate the work out of respect for Oiticica’s principles, turning his practice into something that is read about but never seen or to acknowledge the loss and show the work anyway, in the hopes that some new propositions may continue to unfold? Oiticica’s Argentine contemporary Julio Cortázar once wrote that museums are cemeteries-and there is no curatorial strategy that can resuscitate art from history. Essays in the exhibition catalog meditate at length on how to cope with the many losses that haunt the project: the loss of the artist, who might have warmed to the endeavor (Oiticica died in 1980 at the age of forty-two) the loss of over 1,000 of his works after a fire in 2009 but also the more global loss that always occurs when something that was once so keenly alive becomes a static piece of history. The curators, of course, are well aware of this fact. A trailblazer in the mid-twentieth-century utopian quest to collapse the division between art and everyday life, he was virulently anti-institution, disdainful of the convention of the retrospective, and tensely controlling over the presentation of his work, which was often interactive and site-dependent. To Organize Delirium is a traveling survey of legendary Brazilian artist Hélio Oiticica-and he would have hated it. Hélio Oiticica: To Organize Delirium , Whitney Museum of American Art, 99 Gansevoort Street, New York City, through October 1, 2017 Image courtesy the Whitney Museum of American Art. Hanging sculptures, left to right: P58 Spatial Relief, Red, 1960 P52 Spatial Relief, 1960 NC6 Medium Nucleus 3, 1961–63 all by Hélio Oiticica. Modernists Piet Mondrian, Paul Klee, Wassily Kandinsky, and Kasimir Malevich were also major influences on Oiticica’s work.Hélio Oiticica: To Organize Delirium, installation view. ![]() He and his younger brother Cesar studied under Ivan Serpa and were associated with Serpa’s Grupo Frente, a loose collective of artists that also included Lygia Clark and Lygia Pape. Oiticica’s Parangoles (1964–8), multicolored versions of carnival costumes, were the product of time spent living among the inhabitants of favelas in Rio de Janeiro. He also produced three-dimensional works, often crude painted boxes suspended in space and painted in warm hues of red, yellow, and orange. Oiticica’s _Metaesquemas_ (1957–8), painted in gouache on cardboard, are grids of rectangular or rhomboidal shapes in variations of blue, red, and black the shapes often appear to mirror each other bilaterally, but on closer inspection conform to more complex patterns. A prominent figure in the modernist Brazilian avant-garde of the 1950s and ’60s, Hélio Oiticica produced paintings in the Neo-Constructivist style of geometric abstraction, experimenting with color, form, and material. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |